Tag: Collaborative Peer Review

同儕合作審查 (Collaborative Peer Review) 實驗

同儕審查的時候,如果論文送還作者之前,編輯和審稿人可以坐下來共同探討論文,共同解決稿件問題不是很好嗎?有許多人雖這樣認為,並且主張這樣的交互或合作過程。其他人則持懷疑態度,認為不受他人觀點幹擾的獨立審查更加有效。那麼,哪句格言最佳形容了同儕審查——「三個臭皮匠,勝過諸葛亮」,還是「廚子多了燒壞湯」? 同儕審查試驗 愛思唯爾出版社 (Elsevier) 開展了一項試驗以便得知同儕合作審查審查是否優於傳統審查過程。他們採用Mendeley程式讓編輯和審稿員在審稿時匿名閱讀彼此的評論,並相互探討論文。審稿員、編輯和作者幾乎一致表示合作的過程能夠產生更好的評論。互動討論澄清了審稿員們心中抱持的疑問,並且為編輯提供了更加一致的意見。作者認為合作審查給予修改稿件更精確的指引。至於缺點呢?只有一個。互動式過程比標準的個人審查過程耗時更長。加重了編輯和審稿員的工作負荷。…
( 閱讀全文… )

發表於: 同儕審閱, 學術新知, 論文發表   標籤: , ,

Disclaimer : The opinions expressed here by the Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs' alone, and do not reflect the opinions of Crimson Interactive or any employee thereof. Crimson Interactive is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the Bloggers. While every caution has been taken to provide readers with the most accurate information and honest analysis, please use your discretion before taking any decisions based on the information in this blog. Author will not compensate you in any way whatsoever if you ever happen to suffer a loss/inconvenience/damage because of/while making use of information in this blog.