Tag: 可出版的研究


〝好〞的研究有標準? 讓你評定某個研究人員同儕的研究情況好不好,你第一反應是做什麼? 你若是誠實,那麼你的回答十之八九估計是:上網或資料庫去查對方的論文出版情況、引用數量和出版期刊的影響係數…。 這年頭,好的研究差不多同等於可出版的研究了,背後原因莫過於「出版或滅亡」給年輕研究人員的壓力、開放取閱模式的吸引、研究機構經費與影響力成正比,種種原因之下,總之能出版的才是王道! 可是別忘了,論文要能夠被出版,假設同儕審查過程極度嚴謹且公正的情況下,以下這些標準才應該是使〝可出版的=好的〞能成立的標準:…
( 閱讀全文… )

發表於: 學術誠信   標籤: , ,

Disclaimer : The opinions expressed here by the Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs' alone, and do not reflect the opinions of Crimson Interactive or any employee thereof. Crimson Interactive is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the Bloggers. While every caution has been taken to provide readers with the most accurate information and honest analysis, please use your discretion before taking any decisions based on the information in this blog. Author will not compensate you in any way whatsoever if you ever happen to suffer a loss/inconvenience/damage because of/while making use of information in this blog.